Ask a Parliamentary Question

Is it appropriate for the CEO to step in if the CFO has tendered their resignation?

I am on a board and serve as its secretary. Our upcoming annual meeting agenda includes the election of board members. The nominating committee, following past practice for our organization, has presented a slate of candidates. Formerly we would vote on this slate (bylaws prevent nominations from the floor). I have been advised to report: “…The nominating committee recommended a slate of candidates, accepted by the board of directors for re-election of the incumbents [named here]. No other nominations were received from the membership. Because only one person was nominated for each vacancy, voting by the membership was not necessary. On behalf of the membership, I cast, as secretary, a unanimous ballot for the election of these directors”. This advice was given by an agency that oversees and regulates our business. Is this in line with Robert’s Rules? I have read sections on voting and elections and have not found applicable passages.

Friends, According to our by non-denominational church's by laws, the congregation must approve the selection of a new pastor by a three quarters vote of the established quorum members. He has recently resigned. Some of the congregation wishes him to withdraw his resignation. Our by laws are silent on resignations of the pastor. Is it true that resignations of the pastor, at our church, must also be approved by a three quarters vote of the congregation? His resignation was accepted by our board but not put to a vote of the members. May he withdraw his resignation until the congregation votes on his resignation? Thank you.

An election vote was held for 2 board members nominated any the nominating committee, an additional was nominated from the floor. Upon the voting1 was elected due to largest number of votes the second was elected by 1 vote and declared the 2 winners. Later that night someone decided to review the votes and found 1 ballot to not be eligible to vote and the second ballot just had a NO printed next to one of the names. The board has now decided a revote is needed because it caused a tie vote but are saying only those who voted that evening can vote for the 2 candidates. I feel the vote should include any club member who is eligible to vote not just the ones who voted the first time. Our bylaws do not specify anything about voting during a tie.

I am a member of an HOA with and article in our bylaws that reads: “Board and Association Meeting Procedure. In matters relating to procedure that are not outlined, the latest copy of Robert’s Rules of Order by Robert McConnell Productions will apply.” Because Robert’s Rules is so large and much is not used a regular basis a board member has attempted to provide a policy for meetings with special rules for order the incorporate current practices, but also maintaining the balance of the rules as our parliamentary law to use when needed. This is receiving objections from a group of board members. These board members that have said that Robert’s Rules is just a “default” or “guide” and we do not need to follow them all, and basically choose which ones to enforce. One of the board members wrote another document that states that the board is limited to the use of motions to – main motion, table (which is defined incorrectly as postponing a discussion to a future date), referring to committee, adjourning a meeting and amending. He also allows the use of point of order. I say that none of this is accurate, and it compromises the principles of parliamentary law. If a board can pick and choose which rules they want to follow, that will not prevent a new board from doing the same and it allows a board majority to manipulate the entire process and silence the minority. An additional note, the current budget has allowed for training on Robert’s Rules for the board which 3 of the board member reject as unnecessary. Thank you for your time. Please provide any guidance you can.